**Published on 6 Jul 2016**

I saw many times this kind of a suppositions for the resolution of this problem :

MAYBE THE EARTH IS JUST BIGGER THAN THEY CLAIM THAT IT IS, AND THAT IS WHY WE CAN SEE SO MUCH FURTHER AWAY THAN WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO SEE ACCORDING TO THE GLOBE-EARTH HYPOTHESIS…

Well, let’s test the veracity of this conjecture :

1. IF THE RADIUS OF THE EARTH WERE 4463 MILES (INSTEAD OF 3963 MILES) THEN THE AMOUNT OF THE MISSING CURVATURE IN THIS PICTURE (FOR THE DISTANCE OF 48,5 MILES) WOULD BE 321 m (INSTEAD OF 374 m)!

2. IF THE RADIUS OF THE EARTH WERE 4963 MILES (INSTEAD OF 3963 MILES) THEN THE AMOUNT OF THE MISSING CURVATURE IN THIS PICTURE (FOR THE DISTANCE OF 48,5 MILES) WOULD BE 279 m (INSTEAD OF 374 m)

3. IF THE RADIUS OF THE EARTH WERE 5963 MILES (INSTEAD OF 3963 MILES) THEN THE AMOUNT OF THE MISSING CURVATURE IN THIS PICTURE (FOR THE DISTANCE OF 48,5 MILES) WOULD BE 215 m (INSTEAD OF 374 m).

While we were reckoning these numbers (according to the Pythagoras theorem) we made an allowance of 100 meters for the height of the dune in New Buffalo (which can’t be higher than 50 m + some 50 m for the missing – lowest – part of the Chicago Skyline buildings)

So, if the radius of the earth were 5963 miles then the circumference of the EQUATOR would be roughly 60 000 km which number is also roughly the circumference of the EQUATOR under the supposition according which the earth is flat…INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH…

Only, the problem is this :

IF THE EARTH WERE FLAT AND IF THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EQUATOR WERE ROUGHLY 60 000 KM THEN THE DISTANCE FROM THE NORTH POLE TO THE EQUATOR WOULD BE ROUGHLY 10 000 KM (WHICH IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH REALITY!!!)

BUT IF THE EARTH WERE ROUND AND IF THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE EQUATOR WERE ROUGHLY 60 000 KM THEN THE DISTANCE FROM THE NORTH POLE TO THE EQUATOR WOULD BE ROUGHLY 15 000 KM (WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE !!!)

NOW, USE YOUR BRAIN AND VOTE !!!

Thanks!Share it with your friends!Tweet

Share

Pin It

LinkedIn

Google+

Reddit

Tumblr